A quick search of 'cool album covers' on the internet produces list upon list of thousands of people's opinions. And as a result of this, begs the question 'does the artist need to be on the album cover?'
Here are some albums from the aforementioned 'cool covers' list, and a link to the whole list.
http://www.shortlist.com/entertainment/music/50-coolest-album-covers#gallery-15
![]() |
| The Beatles - Abbey Road |
![]() |
| Joy Division - Unknown Pleasures |
![]() |
| The Sex Pistols - Never Mind The Bollocks |
The Plot Thickens!!
Now, those covers spanned all genre's. My group's practical coursework is focused on the rap and Hip Hop genre, so it makes obvious sense to focus on that.
Now using 3 lists, we can really get a big grasp of famous album covers from the Rap and Hip Hop genre.
Links below
http://uk.complex.com/music/2011/10/hip-hops-50-greatest-album-covers/
http://www.capitalxtra.com/xplore/lists/best-hip-hop-rap-album-covers/
http://genius.com/discussions/51734-Best-hip-hop-album-covers
And upon looking at them, here are some things I have noticed.
- Album covers vary from person to person. Seems kinda obvious but a point to highlight nevertheless. One artist may have an album cover that is more artistic and will not feature the artist at all, whereas other artists will have themselves on the cover.
- The further back the years you look, the more likely you'll find the artist on the artwork



These are some of many examples, showing the point that the decision to have an artist on the album artwork is neither here nor there. There are famous albums which incorporate both ideas, and it's not necessary to use one or the other to achieve success.
When looking to make our digipaks, we shall look to what modern album covers look like and will probably incorporate ideas used by rappers and artists that the group enjoy, as to ensure we stick to modern conventions and ensure we have our own input on the product.








No comments:
Post a Comment